Tesla secures critical chip supply in Samsung megadeal
Subscribe to our free newsletter today to keep up to date with the latest supply chain industry news.
Tesla has committed to a $16.5 billion chip supply agreement with Samsung Electronics, securing its semiconductor pipeline through the end of 2033. This marks one of the largest chip contracts ever signed by an automotive company and signals a critical step in Tesla’s plan to scale its AI-driven product ecosystem. The deal, formally announced in late July, confirms that Samsung’s Taylor, Texas fabrication facility will manufacture Tesla’s next-generation AI6 chips starting in 2026.
Samsung first disclosed the contract without naming the customer. Elon Musk later confirmed the partnership and added that Tesla would be directly involved in optimizing the plant’s operations. The location of the fab near Musk’s residence suggests he intends to oversee the initiative closely.
The chips are expected to power Tesla’s full self-driving systems, the company’s Dojo computing infrastructure, and future robotics efforts including the Optimus humanoid platform.
Samsung’s foundry ambitions get a strategic boost in Texas
For Samsung, the contract offers essential support to its foundry division, which has struggled to grow outside Asia. The Taylor facility, once considered underutilized, now has a long-term customer that could provide consistent output and revenue.
Although the deal averages roughly $2.1 billion annually, analysts remain cautious. The company’s foundry division continues to post losses and trails well behind market leader TSMC, which controls over 65 percent of global foundry share. Samsung lags with a single-digit share but views the Tesla contract as a pivotal opportunity to expand.
How this partnership shifts power in the global chip supply chain
The Tesla–Samsung contract signals a broader trend favoring regional supply resilience over cost savings. The CHIPS and Science Act, which incentivizes domestic semiconductor production, supports this shift. Tesla’s decision to rely on a US-based plant for advanced AI chips reflects a practical response to that policy.
For Samsung, producing chips in Texas reduces exposure to trade disputes, export controls, and currency risks. A recent trade agreement between the US and South Korea introduced a 15 percent tariff framework for imported semiconductors, which helps reduce long-term planning uncertainty.
The Tesla contract may encourage other companies in the automotive and data center markets to consider Samsung as a viable US-based foundry partner.
The Tesla roadmap: AI6 chips, Dojo computing, and robotaxi plans
Tesla’s AI roadmap depends on improvements in computing capacity. Its current full self-driving systems run on Samsung’s AI4 chips, while AI5 chips from TSMC are expected to launch in 2026. The AI6 series is expected to support Tesla’s next round of autonomy and AI-heavy projects, including robotaxis and real-time machine learning applications.
The AI6 chips will also be a critical component in Tesla’s Dojo supercomputer, which underpins neural network training across its global fleet. While Tesla has not released detailed technical goals, internal plans suggest performance targets several times greater than the AI5.
Having chip production in Texas helps streamline development and feedback cycles, especially since Tesla’s engineering operations are concentrated in the region. This could shorten the time between design, testing, and deployment.
Despite the strategic alignment, risks remain. Samsung’s 2-nanometer process node, likely to be used for the AI6 chip, is still under development. Achieving reliable yields at that level is technically challenging, and production problems could delay deliveries.
Tesla’s history with ambitious timelines adds another layer of uncertainty. The company has missed projected rollout dates for its full self-driving software, the Dojo system, and the Optimus robot. Musk has said the $16.5 billion deal is only a baseline and hinted that real volumes may be far higher, which raises additional feasibility questions.
There is also concern about Samsung’s willingness to provide Tesla with deep access to its US foundry operations. Other potential customers may hesitate to work with a foundry that gives one partner influence over shared infrastructure. Depending too heavily on a single customer and location may also introduce operational risk.
While the partnership could reshape the semiconductor market, it will depend on execution, technological progress, and the companies’ ability to deliver on their long-term plans.
Sources: